Enter your email address
Submit
Write your message
Volume 8, Issue 3 (Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2020)
Iran J Ergon 2020, 8(3): 85-93 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sadeghi Naeini H, Zolfaghari M. Ergonomic Evaluation of Workstations in Industry with Emphasis on Economic Considerations (Case Study: Automotive Industry). Iran J Ergon 2020; 8 (3) :85-93
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-736-en.html
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-736-en.html
1- Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Design, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
2- MSc Student, Department of Industrial Design, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran ,Zolfaghari_m@cmps2.iust.ac.ir
2- MSc Student, Department of Industrial Design, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran ,
Abstract: (12005 Views)
Background and Aim: Annually, a percentage of the profits from the sale of goods and services by producers are spent on costs of musculoskeletal disorders due to non-compliance with ergonomic conditions. These costs are not favorable for organizations and employees and in most cases, ergonomic risk factors affect the quality of life of employees.
Methods: The present field study was conducted as a census on 193 workers with medical records in one of the domestic automotive industries on December 2018. The highest prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders belonged to 16 workers, so their workstations were analyzed. Questionnaire with the help of Nordic questionnaire and through interviews with workers has been one of the methods of collecting data. Each of the selected workstations was analyzed with OWAS method after job photography and video recording.
Results: The results showed that three work stations from the viewpoint of Action Categories are at the level of three, three work stations at the level of two and one station at the level of one, and then the costs of incidence and treatment and related actions due to establishing ergonomic conditions were calculated.
Conclusion: Cost of workstations analysis, Preventive actions and also designing a process to reduce the musculoskeletal abnormalities of the staff, which results in ergonomic conditions, compared with the cost of incidence and treatment of musculoskeletal complications is cost-effective for this automotive industry.
Methods: The present field study was conducted as a census on 193 workers with medical records in one of the domestic automotive industries on December 2018. The highest prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders belonged to 16 workers, so their workstations were analyzed. Questionnaire with the help of Nordic questionnaire and through interviews with workers has been one of the methods of collecting data. Each of the selected workstations was analyzed with OWAS method after job photography and video recording.
Results: The results showed that three work stations from the viewpoint of Action Categories are at the level of three, three work stations at the level of two and one station at the level of one, and then the costs of incidence and treatment and related actions due to establishing ergonomic conditions were calculated.
Conclusion: Cost of workstations analysis, Preventive actions and also designing a process to reduce the musculoskeletal abnormalities of the staff, which results in ergonomic conditions, compared with the cost of incidence and treatment of musculoskeletal complications is cost-effective for this automotive industry.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Other Cases
Received: 2020/06/26 | Accepted: 2020/08/7 | ePublished: 2020/09/21
Received: 2020/06/26 | Accepted: 2020/08/7 | ePublished: 2020/09/21
References
1. Piedrahita H. Costs of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in developing countries: Colombia case. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2006; 12(4): 379-86. [DOI:10.1080/10803548.2006.11076696] [PMID]
2. KARPIESIUK Ł. Automotive Industry Report. Warsaw: Polski Związek Przemysłu Motoryzacyjnego, Poland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
3. Błaszczyk A, Zygmańska-Jabłońska M, Wegner-Czerniak K, Ogurkowska MB. Evaluating Progressive Overload Changes of the Musculoskeletal System in Automobile Industry Workers. Pol J Environ Stud. 2020; 29(4): 2579-586. [DOI:10.15244/pjoes/111883]
4. Mattila MA, Vilkki M. OWAS methods. In: Karwowski W, Marras WS (Eds). The Occupational Ergonomics Handbook. USA: CRC Press LLC; 1999: 447-59. [Google Scholar]
5. Grandjean E, Kroemer KH. Fitting the task to the human: a textbook of occupational ergonomics. USA: CRC Press LLC; 1997. [DOI:10.1201/b16825] [PMCID]
6. Choobineh A. Methods of posture assessment in occupational ergonomics. Hamadan: Fanavaran; 2003:79-96. [Google Scholar]
7. Mattila M, Karwowski W, Vilkki M. Analysis of working postures in hammering tasks on building construction sites using the computerized OWAS method. Appl Ergon. 1993; 24(6):405-12. [DOI:10.1016/0003-6870(93)90172-6]
8. Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J. 2008; 8(1):8-20. [DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.005] [PMID]
9. Atrkar Roshan S, Alizadeh SS. Estimate of economic costs of accidents at work in Iran: A case study of occupational accidents in 2012. Iran Occup Health. 2015; 12(1): 12-19. [Article] [Google Scholar]
10. Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Panel on Musculoskeletal Disorders And the Workplace. Musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace: Low back and upper extremities. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 2001. [Google Scholar]
11. Javan Noughabi J, Rezapour A, Setoodezadeh F, Moradpour AA. An Estimation of Direct and Indirect Costs for Elderly Patients in Tehran, 2015. Sadra Med Sci J. 2018; 6(1): 77-85.
12. Mohamadinejad A, Mortazavi SB, Jonidi Jafari A, Mofidi A. Estimation of direct and indirect costs of occupational injuries: A case study in one of the refining industries in Iran in 2015. Tibbi-i-kar J. 2020; 11(4): 57-71. [DOI:10.18502/tkj.v11i4.3651]
13. Vatani J, Razaei F. The relationship between the cost due to accidents in the drug industry and the investment in the Safety Management System. Arch Pharm Pract. 2017; 8(4): 104-08. [Article]
14. Garrouste-Orgeas M, Troché G, Azoulay E, Caubel A, de Lassence A, Cheval C, et al. Body mass index. An additional prognostic factor in ICU patients. Intensive Care Med. 2004; 30(3): 437-43. [DOI:10.1007/s00134-003-2095-2] [PMID]
15. Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sørensen F, Andersson G, et al. Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon. 1987; 18(3):233-37. [DOI:10.1016/0003-6870(87)90010-X]
16. Kivi P, Mattila M. Analysis and improvement of work postures in the building industry: application of the computerised OWAS method. Appl Ergon. 1991; 22(1): 43-48. [DOI:10.1016/0003-6870(91)90009-7]
17. Atrkar Roshan S, Alizadeh SS. Estimation of economic costs of accidents at work in Iran: A case study of occupational accidents in 2012. Iran Occup Health. 2015; 12(1): 12-19. [Article] [Google Scholar]
18. Berry L, Mirabito AM, Berwick DM. A health care agenda for business. MIT Sloan Manag Rev. 2004; 45(4): 56-64. [Article] [Google Scholar]
19. Tamin.ir. Iran: Salary tariff. 2018 April 29. https://tamin.ir/News/Item/58805/2/58805.html
20. Dorman P. Estimating the economic costs of occupational injuries and illnesses in developing countries: essential information for decision-makers. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization; 2012. [Google Scholar]
21. Anderson N, Adams D, Bonauto D, Howard N, Silverstein B. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the back, upper extremity, and knee in Washington State, 2002-2010. Olympia, WA: Safety and Health Assessment and Research for Prevention (SHARP) Program, Washington State Department of Labor and Industries; 2015: 345. [Article] [DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Copyright Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
