Enter your email address
Submit
Write your message
Volume 13, Issue 1 (Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2025)
Iran J Ergon 2025, 13(1): 48-57 |
Back to browse issues page
Research code: 724134983
Ethics code: IR.MUBABOL.HRI.REC.1402.052
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Goran S, Pourhadi S, Tirgar A, Geraili Z. Assessment of the Structural Suitability of Parks for the Elderly with an Emphasis on Ergonomic Considerations. Iran J Ergon 2025; 13 (1) :48-57
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-1077-en.html
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-1077-en.html
1- Student Research Committee, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
2- Social Determinants Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran ,samaneh.pourhadi@gmail.com
3- Mobility Impairment Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
4- Social Determinants Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
2- Social Determinants Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran ,
3- Mobility Impairment Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
4- Social Determinants Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
Abstract: (1422 Views)
Objectives: The use of parks is highly valuable for the elderly for various reasons, including physical, psychological, and social aspects. Therefore, the suitability of these spaces to the needs of the elderly is of particular importance. The present study aimed to determine and introduce criteria for the evaluation and classification of parks in terms of structural suitability for the elderly.
Methods: The present methodological study was designed in 2024 and conducted simultaneously with the psychometric and validation of the structural fit assessment tool for elderly-friendly parks. The structural components were identified through a literature review and validated using the Delphi method. After determining content validity, the items were classified into mandatory, essential, and ideal sections by obtaining at least two-thirds and one-third of the experts' votes, respectively. In addition, descriptive statistics were employed in data processing.
Results: The final review of 58 items by experts revealed that the majority of items (n=41, equivalent to 71%) were mandatory, 13 items (22%) were essential, and four items were ideal. The highest share of mandatory items was declared by ergonomists, and the lowest by gerontologists.
Conclusion: Structural components of park design suitable for the elderly are mandatory or essential in most cases studied, and only a few were identified as ideal. Therefore, the design of elderly-friendly parks requires attention to various aspects, including accessibility, safety, and comfort.
Methods: The present methodological study was designed in 2024 and conducted simultaneously with the psychometric and validation of the structural fit assessment tool for elderly-friendly parks. The structural components were identified through a literature review and validated using the Delphi method. After determining content validity, the items were classified into mandatory, essential, and ideal sections by obtaining at least two-thirds and one-third of the experts' votes, respectively. In addition, descriptive statistics were employed in data processing.
Results: The final review of 58 items by experts revealed that the majority of items (n=41, equivalent to 71%) were mandatory, 13 items (22%) were essential, and four items were ideal. The highest share of mandatory items was declared by ergonomists, and the lowest by gerontologists.
Conclusion: Structural components of park design suitable for the elderly are mandatory or essential in most cases studied, and only a few were identified as ideal. Therefore, the design of elderly-friendly parks requires attention to various aspects, including accessibility, safety, and comfort.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Environmental Ergonomics
Received: 2025/03/10 | Accepted: 2025/05/31 | ePublished: 2025/05/31
Received: 2025/03/10 | Accepted: 2025/05/31 | ePublished: 2025/05/31
References
1. Moti Haghshenas N. Sociological dimensions of population aging and the challenge of active aging in Iran. Sociol Studies Iran. 2011;1(2):133-147.
2. Younes SR, Marques B, McIntosh J. Public spaces for older people: a review of the relationship between public space to quality of life. Sustainability. 2024;16(11):4583. [DOI:10.3390/su16114583]
3. Ziari K, Yousefi S. A comparative study of population growth indicators in iranian cities and their geographical neighbors. Urban Economic. 2024;8(2):45-62.
4. Mirfallah Nasiri SN. Demographic characteristics of population aging and related indicators in Iran. Iran J Official Statistics Studies. 2008;18(2):1-14.
5. Mirzaie M, Darabi S. Population aging in Iran and rising health care costs. Iran J Ageing ( Salmand). 2017;12(2):156-169. [DOI:10.21859/sija-1202156]
6. Mazloumi A, Hajizadeh L, Feyzi V. Development and validation of ergonomics elderly house risk factors checklist and assessment elderly functional ability checklist. Iran J Ergon. 2019;7(1):20-7. [DOI:10.30699/jergon.7.1.20]
7. Kalantar M, Tirgar A, Pourhadi S. Identifying structural suitability components of aged-friendly mosques in Iran: a qualitative study. Iran J Ageing ( Salmand). 2021;16(3):362-375. [DOI:10.32598/sija.2021.16.3.2414.2]
8. Janipour B, Arasteh S, Taheri MR, Hossein SF. Environmental needs assessment of the elderly in Karaj urban parks. J Archit Environ Res. 2024;1(1):49-60.
9. de Oliveira Cunha MVP, Costa ADL, da Costa Ireland M. Ergonomic aspects to be considered in planning public spaces destined for elderly people. Work. 2012;41(Supplement 1):3827-3833. [DOI:10.3233/WOR-2012-0685-3827] [PMID]
10. Xiang L, Mei T. Developing the age-friendly community parks survey for older adults: assessing aging environment. Urban Forestry Urban Green. 2024;99:128424. [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128424]
11. Loukaitou-Sideris A, Brozen M, Levy-Storms L. Placemaking for an aging population: guidelines for senior-friendly parks.UCLA. 2014.
12. Reddy R. Design guidelines for urban public spaces for the elderly, Thesis:Master of Architecture. Uttarakhand: Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee; 2017.
13. Abbaszadeh G, Kokabi F, Dogani S, Mahmoudi H. Examining factors influencing the willingness of the elderly to use neighborhood parks in the city of Mashhad (case study: Sajjad neighborhood parks in Mashhad). The Second Annual Conference on Architecture, Urban Planning and Urban Management Research. 2016.
14. Cohen DA, Scribner RA, Farley TA. A structural model of health behavior: a pragmatic approach to explain and influence health behaviors at the population level. Prev Med. 2000;30(2):146-154. [DOI:10.1006/pmed.1999.0609] [PMID]
15. Keskinen KE, Rantakokko M, Suomi K, Rantanen T, Portegijs E. Nature as a facilitator for physical activity: defining relationships between the objective and perceived environment and physical activity among community-dwelling older people. Health Place. 2018;49:111-119. [DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.12.003] [PMID]
16. Miami elderly community. Miami-dade age-friendly parks, toolkit. Health Foundation of South Florida Web Site; 2025.
17. Hosseini M, Sarai M, Rezai M. Assessment of safety in urban parks (Case of study: regional of city parks). Journal of Urban-Regional Studies and Research. 2013;5(18):123-38.
18. Iranshahi A, Ghalehnoee M. An evaluation of the access of seniors with physical disabilities to required facilities in urban spaces; the case of chahar bagh-e Abbasi street of Isfahan. MEJDS. 2017;7:37.
19. Moghimi N, Momeni K. Investigating and evaluating the efficiency of urban spaces in meeting the needs of the elderly with an emphasis on urban parks. Quart Sci Res J New Approach Hum Geograph. 2019;11(3):397-414.
20. Zhai Y, Baran PK. Urban park pathway design characteristics and senior walking behavior. Urban Forest Urban Green. 2017;21:60-73. [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2016.10.012]
21. Krey M. Age-friendly park programs: lessons for Boston, Thesis: Master of Arts in Urban and Environmental Planning and Policy Tufts University. Tufts University; 2016.
22. Rantakokko M, Iwarsson S, Portegijs E, Viljanen A, Rantanen T. Associations between environmental characteristics and life-space mobility in community-dwelling older people. J Aging Health. 2015;27(4):606-621. [DOI:10.1177/0898264314555328] [PMID]
23. Levy-Storms L, Chen L, Loukaitou-Sideris A. Older adults' needs and preferences for open space and physical activity in and near parks: A systematic review. J Aging Phys Act. 2018;26(4):682-696. [DOI:10.1123/japa.2016-0354] [PMID]
24. Jalilisadrabad S, Sattari M, Jalili Sadr Abad S. Urban furniture and its design considerations in urban spaces. Urban Design Discourse-a Rev Contemporary Litreatures Theory. 2024;5(4):55-66.
25. Loukaitou-Sideris A, Levy-Storms L, Chen L, Brozen M. Parks for an aging population: needs and preferences of low-income seniors in Los Angeles. J Am Plan Assoc. 2016;82(3):236-251. [DOI:10.1080/01944363.2016.1163238]
26. Hosseini SH, Rafiee G, Javadian SH. Analyzing of the pathology of public green space design in urban areas (case study: eram park in Sabzevar). Environ Sci Technol. 2016;18(3):149-171.
27. Taheri F, Kavusi A, Faghihnia Torshozi Y, Farshad AA, Saremi M. Validity and reliability assessment of Persian version of system usability scale (sus) for traffic signs. Iran Occup Health. 2017;14(1):12-22.
28. Rahmanpour MS, Ebadi A, Tirgar A. The necessity of ergonomic considerations in accreditation of hospitals with emphasize on elderly features. Iran J Ergon. 2018;6(3):1-10. [DOI:10.30699/jergon.6.3.1]
29. Arabian A, Zakerian A. Comparison of usability of touch-screen and button cell phones among elderly users. Iran J Ergon .2019;7(1):1-9. [DOI:10.30699/jergon.7.1.1]
30. Khalil Ahmed ME. Designing an inclusive and age-friendly parks in Egypt. case study at Aswan city. Int Design J. 2022;12(4):105-120. [DOI:10.21608/idj.2022.245856]
31. Yu W, Sun B, Hu H. Sustainable development research on the spatial differences in the elderly suitability of Shanghai urban parks. Sustainability. 2019;11(22):6521. [DOI:10.3390/su11226521]
32. Raphael P J, Kristeen Thomas N. Geriatric friendly public spaces. Proceedings of the 7th Biennial International Conference On Emerging Trends in Engineering, Science &Technology (ICETEST 2023); 2023. [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4482886]
33. Black K. Age-friendly sarasota county action plan 2017-2020. University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee; 2017.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Copyright Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
