Write your message
Volume 11, Issue 3 (Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2023)                   Iran J Ergon 2023, 11(3): 190-198 | Back to browse issues page

Research code: 14020129507
Ethics code: IR.UMSHA.REC.1401.1087

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Darestani M, Tapak L, Mirzaie AliAbadi M, Mahdavi N. Psychometrics of an Occupational Cognitive Failures Questionnaire for Heavy Machinery Operators in Road and Urban Construction: A Study of Validity and Reliability. Iran J Ergon 2023; 11 (3) :190-198
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-976-en.html
1- Department of HSE, Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2- Department of Biostatistics, Modeling of Non-communicable Diseases Research Center, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
3- Department of HSE, Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, Center of Excellence for Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
4- Department of Ergonomics, Center of Excellence for Occupational Health, Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , nmahdavi1@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (656 Views)
Objectives: Today we are witnessing tremendous growth in construction and the use of heavy machinery. As a significant portion of human errors is attributed to cognitive failures, there is a need for robust tools to assess these cognitive failures. Therefore, the primary goal of this study was to investigate the psychometrics of the current Occupational Cognitive Failures Questionnaire for Heavy Machinery Operators in Road and Urban Construction.
Methods: A total of 84 drivers of road and urban construction machinery were selected by simple random sampling method. Initially, job-related items for these people were selected for inclusion in the questionnaire, irrelevant items were removed, and proposed items were added. To assess structural validity, the tool was administered to 10 experts. Then, content validity ratios (CVR) and content validity indices (CVI) were determined for each of the items and evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis conducted in AMOS software (version 23). Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to measure reliability. Data were analyzed in SPSS software (version 20).
Results: The final questionnaire comprised 16 items, with CVR and CVI leading to their inclusion in the final structure. The CVR of the questionnaire was 0.90. Additionally, the indices of the fitted model included CMIN/DF, TLI, CFI, IFI, GFI, AGFI, and RMSE, which were obtained at 1.16, 0.851, 0.88, 0.898, 0.86, 0.802, and 0.044, respectively. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated at 0.633.
Conclusion: The psychometrics of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire demonstrated suitable validity and reliability for heavy machinery operators in road and urban construction. It can be effectively used for ergonomic evaluations.
Full-Text [PDF 1168 kb]   (78 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Other Cases
Received: 2023/10/19 | Accepted: 2023/12/21 | ePublished: 2023/12/21

References
1. Prasad SVSR, Rao YP. Study on validation of wholesaler selection of personal protective equipment to improve safety performance in a construction organization in India. Int J Manag Value Supply Chain. 2013;4(2):17. [DOI: 10.5121/ijmvsc.2013.4202]
2. Samanta S, Gochhayat J. Critique on occupational safety and health in construction sector: An Indian perspective. Mater Today Proc. 2023;80:3016–21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.707]
3. Hämäläinen P, Neupane S, Nygård C-H, Sauni R, Takala J. Comparative global estimates on the work-related burden of accidents and diseases. Saf Health Work. 2022;13:S130. [DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2021.12.1158]
4. Duarte J, Marques AT, Santos Baptista J. Occupational accidents related to heavy machinery: a systematic review. Safety. 2021;7(1):21. [DOI: 10.3390/safety7010021]
5. Arghami S, Moradi M, Habibi F. Developing a Mental Fatigue Questionnaire for public transport bus drivers.[In Persian] Iran J Ergon. 2015;3(3):30–7.
6. Houshyar E, Daneshmandi H. A Survey on the Sleep Quality in Agricultural Tractors Drivers in Different Climatic Conditions. [In Persian] Iran J Ergon. 2022;9(4):226–36. [DOI: 10.18502/iehfs.v9i4.14301]
7. Aliabadi M, Rahmani R, Darvishi E, Farhadian M, Shafiee Motlagh M, Mahdavi N. Experimental study of exposure to human vibration and its relationship with physical performance in mining equipment operators. [In Persian] Iran J Ergon. 2022;9(3):39–54.
8. Yılmaz C, Turan AH. The causes of occupational accidents in human resources: the human factors theory and the accident theory perspective. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2023;29(2):796–805. [DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2022.2082677] [PMID]
9. Mirzaei Aliabadi M, Aghaei H, Kalatpour O, Soltanian AR, Nikravesh A. Analysis of human and organizational factors that influence mining accidents based on Bayesian network. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020;26(4):670–7. [DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1455411]
10. Mozaffar A, Neisi A, Arshadi N. An Investigation of Psychological Variables as a Predictor of Accident-involvement in Employees of National Iranian Drilling Company. J Occup Hyg Eng Vol. 2018;5(3):17–24. [DOI: 10.21859/johe.5.3.17]
11. Perkins AM, Corr PJ. Cognitive ability as a buffer to neuroticism: Churchill’s secret weapon? Pers Individ Dif. 2006;40(1):39–51. [DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.05.012]
12. Wright DB, Osborne JE. Dissociation, cognitive failures, and working memory. Am J Psychol. 2005;118(1):103–14. [PMID]
13. Wallace JC, Vodanovich SJ. Can accidents and industrial mishaps be predicted? Further investigation into the relationship between cognitive failure and reports of accidents. J Bus Psychol. 2003;17:503–14. [DOI: 10.1023/A:1023452218225]
14. Allahyari T, Hassanzadeh RN, Khosravi Y, Zayeri F. Development and evaluation of a new questionnaire for rating of cognitive failures at work. 2011.
15. Eser HY, Inan MY, Kucuker MU, Kilciksiz CM, Yilmaz S, Dincer N, et al. Development, validity and reliability of the 4-point Likert Turkish version of cognitive failures questionnaire. Annals of Medical Research.27(6), 1650-6. [DOI: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.308]
16. Volosin M, Hallgató E, Csábi E. Validation of the Hungarian version of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ). Heliyon. 2023;9(1) :e12910. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12910] [PMID]
17. Yan S, Tran CC, Wei Y, Habiyaremye JL. Driver’s mental workload prediction model based on physiological indices. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2017. [DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1368951]
18. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28(4):563–75.
19. Harrington D. Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford university press; 2009.
20. Yurdugül H. Minimum sample size for Cronbach’s coefficient alpha: a Monte-Carlo study. Hacettepe Üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi Derg. 2008;35(35):1–9.
21. Shi J, Mo X, Sun Z. [Content validity index in scale development]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012;37(2):152–5. [DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007] [PMID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Ergonomics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb |