Enter your email address
Submit
Write your message
Volume 9, Issue 3 (Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2021)
Iran J Ergon 2021, 9(3): 121-135 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nazari L, shahcheraghi A, Etessam I. Explain the Model of Optimizing the Relationship between Labor and the Industrial Environment Through Architectural Criteria. Iran J Ergon 2021; 9 (3) :121-135
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-839-en.html
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-839-en.html
1- Ph.D Student, Department of Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ,Shahcheraghi@srbiau.ac.ir
3- Professor, Department of Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ,
3- Professor, Department of Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (4798 Views)
Background and Objectives: Job satisfaction and improving employee performance due to direct relationships with individual and environmental factors is one of the most important issues in optimizing the industrial environment. Since the main lever of decreasing or increasing productivity is human resources, one of the issues that will engage the leading managers in the coming decade is trying to increase employee productivity. Regarding the disposal of some affairs to the private sector and lack of adequate health supervision, in some cases, we witness an increase in this disorder in our country. The physical environment of the built environment affects mental health directly and indirectly, meaning that the physical environment, such as the residence and workplace, is a place for human life and some of its psychological effects are unknown.
Methods: The purpose of this research is to explain the model optimization model of labor and the industrial environment through architectural standards. This research is an applied research. In this research, the opinions were gathered through interviews. Then using grounded theory and open, axial and selective coding, the model was developed. In the following, confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the validity of the items by Lisrel software.
Results: The results showed that indices such as environmental and physical ergonomics, visual contrast of space, environmental psychology, spatial separation of space, attention to voice and color are influential.
Conclusion: Psychological comfort is an inevitable aspect of user satisfaction studies. These findings help designers, architects, planners, and facility managers to develop workplace design principles.
Methods: The purpose of this research is to explain the model optimization model of labor and the industrial environment through architectural standards. This research is an applied research. In this research, the opinions were gathered through interviews. Then using grounded theory and open, axial and selective coding, the model was developed. In the following, confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the validity of the items by Lisrel software.
Results: The results showed that indices such as environmental and physical ergonomics, visual contrast of space, environmental psychology, spatial separation of space, attention to voice and color are influential.
Conclusion: Psychological comfort is an inevitable aspect of user satisfaction studies. These findings help designers, architects, planners, and facility managers to develop workplace design principles.
Type of Study: Review |
Subject:
Ergonomics in Design
Received: 2021/09/14 | Accepted: 2022/01/30 | ePublished: 2022/01/30
Received: 2021/09/14 | Accepted: 2022/01/30 | ePublished: 2022/01/30
References
1. Tabatabaian M, Tamannaee M. Investigation the Effect of Built Environments on Psychological Health. Journal of Architect, Urban Design & Urban Planning.2013; 6(11):101-109.
2. Saberi M, shirouyehzad H. Job Satisfaction’s Effect on Employee Productivity in Sepahan Oil Companey. Second National Conference on Industrial and Systems Engineering.
3. Esmaeili MR, Seidzadeh H. The Survey of Job Satisfaction Effect on Performance with Mediating Role of Organizational Loyalty. 2015; 25(83):51-68.
4. Richard J, Holden, Cornet VP, Valdez RS. Patient ergonomics: 10-year mapping review of patient-centered human factors. Applied Ergonomics. 2020; 82. [DOI]
5. Khandan M, Hosseinzadeh Z, Sakhaei Z, Momenian S, Koohpaei A. The relationship between job satisfaction and general health in workers and workplace accidents in medium-scale industries. Journal of Occupational Hygiene Engineering. 2015;2(2):43-51.
6. Eliyana A, Ma’arif S, Muzakki. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment effect in the transformational leadership towards employee performance. European Research on Management and Business Economics (ERMBE). 2019; 3: 144-150. [DOI]
7. Zarei H, Shojaei H , Amani H. Color and Its Impact on People in the Workplace: A Systematic Review Article. Journal of Ergonomics.2020; 8(1):1-11.
8. Furnham A, Eracleous A, Chamorro‐Premuzic T. Personality. motivation and job satisfaction: Hertzberg meets the Big Five. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2009; 24(8):765-779. [DOI]
9. Küller R, Mikellides B, Janssens J. Color, arousal, and performance-A comparison of three experiments. Color Research & Application. 2009; 34:141-152. [DOI]
10. Maina EC, Muchiri PN, Keraita JN. Improvement of Facility Layout Using Systematic Layout Planning. IOSR Journal of Engineering. 2018; 08(5):33-43.
11. Evans GW. The Built Environment and Mental Health. Journal of Urban Health. 2013; 80(4):536-555.
12. Choobineh A, Motamedzade M, Kazemi M, Moghimbeigi A, Heidari Pahlavian A. The impact of ergonomics intervention on psychosocial factors and musculoskeletal symptoms among office workers. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2011; 41:671-676. [DOI]
13. Bortolini M, Faccio M, Gamberi M, Pilati F. Motion Analysis System (MAS) for production and ergonomics assessment in the manufacturing processes. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2020; 139. [DOI]
14. Diego-Mas JA. Designing Cyclic Job Rotations to Reduce the Exposure to Ergonomics Risk Factors. International journal of Environmental Research andPublic Health. 2020; 17(3): 1073. [DOI]
15. Alimohammad I, Ahmadi F, Soltani R, Nouri N. Investigation continuous noise exposure and occupational performance of the workers in the pharmaceutical industry: A Case Study in an Ampoule and Vial Production Industry. Occupational Medicine Quarterly Journal. 2019;10(4):11-22.
16. Dorman P. Estimating the economic costs of occupational injuries and illnesses in developing countries: Essential information for decision-makers. International Labour Organization. 2012.
17. Mostafavi MM, Ghazanfari H, Babaeianpour M. Structural Model of Effective Ergonomic Factors on Implementation of Quality Management Systems. journal of Production and Operations Management. 2014;5(1):93-112.
18. Parsons KC. Environmental ergonomics: a review of principles, methods and models. Applied ergonomics. 2000;31(6):581-594. [DOI]
19. Mital A, Kilbom A, Kumar S. Ergonomics Guidelines and Problem Solving. Elsevier Science.2000;1.
20. Alimohammad I, Abolaghasemi J,Rahmani K , Ahmadi F. A Study of Mental and Physiological Effects of Chronic Exposure to Noise in an Automotive Industry. Journal of Ergonomics.2019; 7(1):54-62.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Copyright Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
