Write your message

Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Squat

Mohammad Amin Mououdi, Seyedeh Fatemeh Razzaghi Pahnehkolai, Fariba Qhaempanah, Amirhossein Mahdavi, Ahmad Reza Veisi,
Volume 8, Issue 2 (6-2020)
Abstract

Background and Aim: Two toilets in sitting-type and squatting-type (Traditional) are currently used by Iranian People. Since each of these two types has its own disadvantages and merits, this research aims to design a squatting-type toilet based on ergonomic principles to eliminate its disadvantages.
Methods: 61 subjects (29 males and 32 females) aged 19-60 years were enrolled in this study. Seven anthropometric characteristics were measured using a tape measure with an accuracy of one millimeter in these subjects. A questionnaire containing 4 questions was given to them. Each person was squatting for 2 minutes on different slopes from 0 to 20 degrees. Assessment of Localized Postural Discomfort (LPD) by asking people at 3 points of body, at different slopes, and goniometry in the areas of (A), (B) ,(C) and (D) was also performed.
Results: Based on the anthropometric characteristics of the individuals, LPD and goniometry findings in different areas of the body and dimensions of toilet in the sole position, length 32.33 and width 12.74 cm was obtained. The angle between the soles of the feet was 23.33 degrees and the required slope of the soles was 12 degrees.
Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that modification of the sole position in squatting-type toilet and its sloping design can be effective in making users comfortable. Given the small number of studies on this type of toilet, further studies in this area, including research on specific populations such as the disabled people, children, pregnant women, the elderly, etc., are necessary.

Fatemeh Rezaie Pourmashizi, Behrouz Hajilou, Rashid Heidarimoghadam, Sara Anbarian, Mehrdad Anbarian,
Volume 13, Issue 1 (5-2025)
Abstract

Background and Objectives: Core muscles of individuals with low back pain show a different pattern of activity compared to the healthy group during load lifting. This issue may be due to changes in spinal control mechanisms such as muscle synergies. The aim of this study was to compare the synergy pattern of selected core muscles and lower limbs muscles during load lifting and lowering with two different techniqus among females with non-specific back pain in comparison with healthy group.

Methods: Eighteen healthy females with non-specific back apin and 18 match controls participated in this study. The activity of 8 muscles of the core and lower limbs was recorded while lifting a load of 10% of the subject's mass with stoop and squat techniques. Then, using non-negative matrix factorization algorithm, the pattern of muscle synergies was extracted. Pearson's correlation method and independed t-test was used to compare synergy patterns (p<0.05).

Results: Patients with back pain had a different muscle synergy pattern compared to the healthy group in both stoop and squat techniques. The peak muscle synergy patterns of patients in both techniques were different from healthy subjects and were created in a different time cycle of lifting the load.

Conclusion: The results of this study showed that individuals with non-specific back pain use different synergy patterns during load lifting, and the body's control system may respons differently in patients with non-specific low back pain compared to healthy individuals. It is possible that the changes observed in the relative weight of muscles in patients and healthy people are caused by the changes in muscle synergy patterns, which requires further studies.



Page 1 from 1     

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Ergonomics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb |