Write your message

Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Ergonomic Climate

Akram Mahmoodi, Teimour Allahyari,
Volume 13, Issue 2 (8-2025)
Abstract

Objectives: In modern demanding work environments, workforce resilience and ergonomic climate are recognized as critical factors for maintaining employee well-being and enhancing organizational productivity.
Methods: This cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study investigated the relationship between ergonomic climate and employee resilience in a gas company. A total of 170 employees were selected through cluster random sampling. Data were collected using two validated instruments, namely the Ergonomic Climate Questionnaire and the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Statistical analyses were conducted in SPSS software (version 26), using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, one-sample t-tests, and regression analysis.
Results: Mean scores of gas company ergonomic climate and employee resilience were obtained at 135.03±29.96 and 96.5±16.44, respectively. The correlation coefficient between ergonomic climate and employee resilience for 171 samples was calculated at +0.22. The findings indicated that the mean scores for ergonomic climate, operational performance, employee well-being, and individual resilience were significantly higher than the midpoint of the Likert scale. Moreover, individual resilience was found to have a positive and significant correlation with all dimensions of ergonomic climate, namely management commitment, employee involvement, hazard identification and control, and training and knowledge. However, no significant relationships were observed between demographic variables (age, gender, education, work experience) and resilience.
Conclusion: An appropriate ergonomic climate plays a significant role in reducing stress and improving the psychological conditions of the workplace. Employees' resilience can be positively affected by physical and mental health enhancements, stress reduction, job satisfaction increases, and improvements in work-life quality. Therefore, organizational attention to ergonomic issues and the implementation of supportive strategies can improve workplace ergonomics, thereby enhancing individual resilience among employees. 

Abolfazl Ghahramani, Cyrus Alinia, Sahar Mirnabizadeh,
Volume 14, Issue 2 (6-2026)
Abstract

Background and Objective: Inappropriate workplace design and neglect of ergonomics and safety reduce productivity and increase organizational costs. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between safety climate and ergonomic climate with individual performance and the approximate PALY index.

Methods: This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted in 2025 with 420 employees from six food companies in Urmia, Iran. Data were collected using validated questionnaires for safety climate, ergonomic climate, individual work performance, and a productivity evaluation form was employed to calculate the approximate PALY index. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, Spearman's correlation, and linear regression.

Results: A strong positive correlation was found between safety climate and ergonomic climate (ρ = 0.84, p < 0.01). Safety climate showed a weak positive correlation with individual performance (ρ = 0.12, p = 0.01). Multiple linear regression revealed that ergonomic climate (β = 0.28, p < 0.001) and company of employment (β = -0.31, p < 0.001) were significant predictors of individual performance, whereas work experience (β = 0.87, p < 0.001) and company of employment (β = -0.08, p < 0.001) were significant predictors of the approximate PALY index.

Conclusion: The strong correlation between safety and ergonomic climate highlights them as synergistic components. Ergonomic climate (not safety climate) is an independent predictor of individual performance, while work experience is the strongest predictor of the approximate PALY index. The lack of association between self-rated performance and the approximate PALY index reveals a deep perceptual gap between employee self-assessment and managerial evaluation


Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Ergonomics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb |