Write your message
Volume 8, Issue 2 (Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2020)                   Iran J Ergon 2020, 8(2): 50-60 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

nazem F, rezaei A, Jalili M, saki H. Design and Validation of Non-Exercise Equations for Estimation of Aerobic Capacity in Iranian Boys. Iran J Ergon 2020; 8 (2) :50-60
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-675-en.html
1- Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Section of Sport Physiology, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran , f.nazem1336@gmail.com
2- Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Section of Sport Physiology, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 709 kb]   (9422 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (10143 Views)
According to the results of the present study, it is possible to use aerobic capacity estimation equations, is a simple, accurate, safe tool in assessing the baseline cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak). The use of non-Exercise equations in the planning of exercise in large populations of adolescent boys and even as a daily clinical practice in the elderly and heart patients with the goals of promoting health, cardiovascular health, preventive actions is very important.

Extended Abstract:   (1276 Views)
Introduction

Increased cardio-respiratory fitness (CRF) is one of the key factors related to physical fitness that is associated with reduced mortality and metabolic diseases [1]. CRF is an important indicator of the ability of the heart and arteries to pump oxygen-rich blood to the tissues during exercise and the consumption of as much oxygen in these tissues, therefore, CRF is essential in most sports [3, 2]. This index has been reported as an indicator for measuring health status and predicting cardiovascular diseases [5, 4]. Researchers consider the gold standard index of CRF evaluation to be maximum oxygen consumption or VO2peak [7, 6]. The standard CRF assessment method is direct VO2peak measurement using a respirator analyzer in maximal graded exercise test using a treadmill [8].
However, the possibility of using these exercise tests for patients, sports injuries and people who have been away from exercise for a long time is dangerous and sometimes impossible. The use of field or laboratory sports tests in large populations and epidemiological studies or when it requires rapid VO2peak estimation is limited despite its relatively high accuracy and sensitivity [20].
In order to design and validate different multivariate regression predictor equations, in different populations, researchers have found a close relationship between anthropometric and physiological variables such as age, sex, BSA, infertility, resting heart rate with VO2peak [26-24, 22]. This method of non-exercise predictive equations that estimate people at different ages without VO2peak physical activity can be useful in the elderly, especially in patients with cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and metabolic patients [27, 10]. According to research, in Iran, less design and validation of non-exercise equations predicting VO2peak has been done and most of the existing equations are valid for foreign countries [28-30]. Therefore, in the present study, the design of indigenous estimation equations of non-exercise estimation with high determination coefficient and low predictive error of VO2peak predictor and validation by standard method of performing sports tests during disabling activity along with respiratory gas analysis in adolescent boys population is investigated.


 

Materials and Methods

In this applied study, we voluntarily selected 156 healthy male students aged 13 to 17 years from among the selected secondary schools in a targeted cluster method from districts one and two of Hamadan city, Iran.
Students were first asked to complete a PARQ health status questionnaire in consultation with their parents and complete the PARQ.
In this study, 104 people were included in the model design group to design the VO2peak non-exercise equation. We selected about 35 statistical samples for each independent variable (age, BMI, resting heart rate). Also, 52 people were included in the VO2peak indigenous equations to verify the non-exercise indigenous equations. The present research process was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (Code of Ethics Committee IR.BASU.REC.1398.006 :).
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (K-S) was used to examine the normal distribution of data. Parametric statistics and appropriate descriptive statistics were used to test the research hypotheses [32]. Pearson correlation was used to evaluate the relationship between VO2peak and independent variables (age, weight, BMI, body surface area and resting heart rate). To design the VO2peak non-exercise estimation equation, step-wise multivariate regression was used to design the model. The selection criteria for regression equation were considering the components of coefficient of determination (R2), standard estimation error (SEE) and standard relative estimation error (100% (mean VO2peak measured / SEE) =% SEE) [33]. In order to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of the non-exercise native equation designed in the present study, the estimated VO2peak obtained from the non-exercise native equations was compared with the actual VO2peak measured in the subjects of the validation group (n = 52). This comparison was made using Pearson correlation test and paired t-test. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 24 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill., USA) at the level of P-value <0.05.


 

Results

Significant correlations were observed between the measured VO2peak and the anthropometric and physiological variables (R=0.122 - 0.799, P<0.001). Also, a valid non-exercise linear equation for boys' VO2peak prediction was designed with variables such as age, BMI and resting heart rate (SEE = 3.59 mL/kg/min, R2 = 0.712, P<0.001). The estimated VO2peak from equations had a significant correlation with the obtained criterion value. (R = 0.707 – 0.730, P<0.01) (Tables 1-3).
 

Table 1. Assessing the accuracy of foreign VO2peak estimation equations in Iranian boys

Equation Measured VO2peak Bonen et al. 1979)) Erdmann et al. 1999)) Verma et al. (1986)
VO2peak (mL/kg/min) 41.69±6.47 5.37±49.99 6.64±50.11 0.52±40.23
Mean difference  (mL/kg/min) ــــــــــ 8.30±4.64* 8.41±4.82* -1.44±6.24*
Correlation ــــــــــ 0.707** 0.730** 0.730**

**P-value<0.01; *P-value<0.05


 

Comparison of standard and estimated VO2peak in the validation group

Figure 1.  Comparison of standard and estimated VO2peak in the validation group (Issue 1: VO2peak measured standard, Numbers 2-4: VO2peak estimated with native non-exercise equations, Numbers 5-7: VO2peak estimated with foreign non-exercise equations). Significant difference between measured and estimated VO2peak P-value <0.01
 

Table 2. Correlation matrix of the studied variables in the linear model

Variables VO2peak Age Weight BMI BSA HRrest
VO2peak (mL/kg/min) 1 0.122 -0.689* -0.799* -0.629* -0.267**
Age (year)   1 0.364* 0.174 0.421* -0.384**
Weight (kg)     1 0.931** 0.991* 0.013-
BMI (kg/m2)       1 0.882* 0.055
BSA (m2)         1 0.025-
HRrest (bpm)           1

**P-value<0.01; *P-value<0.05

Table 3. VO2peak non-exercise estimation equations

Non-exercise estimation equations VO2peak (1) (kg/m2) BMI × -1.057 -64.221= (mL/kg/min) VO2peak
(0.001>P ، mL/kg/min -4.05 = SEE ،0.634= R2)
Non-exercise estimation equations VO2peak (2) VO2peak (mL/kg/min) -45.678+1.323× Age (year) -1.116× BMI (kg/m2)
(R2 -0.697 SEE -3.69 mL/kg/min, P>0.001
Non-exercise estimation equations VO2peak (3) VO2peak (mL/kg/min)=57.617+1.021×Age (year) -1.092 × BMI (kg/m2) -0.099× HRrest(bpm)
(0.001> P ، mL/kg/min 3.59 = SEE ،0.712= R2)
 

 
Discussion

The results of this study showed that native non-exercise regression equations have a high validity in estimating the aerobic capacity of 13 to 17 year old boys (P<0.001 and R2 = 0.63-71). In this study, 3 native non- exercise equations were designed and validated to estimate VO2peak for healthy boys. Based on our results, the independent variables of age, infertility and HR(rest) in the range of 63 to 71% explain the variability of boys' VO2peak (P<0.001 mL / kg / min, SEE = 4.5 - 3.59). In the present study, a high correlation was found between BMI and VO2peak, which was consistent with the results of George et al. [16]. But Kind et al. [34] reported that the effect of waist circumference on VO2peak was stronger than BMI in men. The reason for the difference with the findings of the present study is probably due to the high effect of abdominal obesity at older ages on VO2peak [35]. Also, a high correlation was reported between HR(rest) and VO2peak, which was consistent with the results of George et al. [16] and Schantz et al. [36] but inconsistent with the results of Hess [37]. This difference may be in the level of readiness, gender and nutrition of the subjects. However, no significant correlation was observed between age and VO2peak, which was consistent with the results of Wei et al. [38] but inconsistent with the results of Fleg et al. [39].
 Although the variables used in the non-exercise equations of previous studies are different, anthropometric variables, age, heart rate while resting and doing activities, previous physical activity, fat percentage, genetics and smoking have usually been the most important factors influencing Vo2peak [14-14, 11, 10]. In the present study, a significant correlation was observed between Vo2peak obtained from the standard method and measured variables (Table 3). Scientific studies have identified body composition factors such as weight, body fat percentage and restlessness as significant variables in linear and nonlinear regression equations of Vo2peak estimation that can have a positive or negative correlation [47-47, 17].
Our findings indicated that the use of more than one variable in predictive equations tends to create higher correlation values between predicted and measured VO2peak (Table 4). However, the study of alignment components in the multivariate regression pattern of VO2peak non-exercise estimation equations showed the occurrence of an effective alignment between the independent variables of illness, BMI and weight in the equations, which removed these variables from the native equations of this study (VIF = 298.3, tolerance=0.003). The validity and high accuracy of the three indigenous non-exercise predictor equations measured by standard VO2peak were confirmed by a suitable statistical sample in this study (SEE = 3.59 - 4.59 and R = 0.79 - 0.84). In Equation No. 3, by selecting the physiologically and physiologically dependent variables of age, BMI and HR(rest), the optimal correlation between aerobic capacity by non-exercise method (SEE = 3.59 and R = 0.84) and the standard method was obtained, which is compared with two native linear equations. The other was even smaller in predictive error.


 

Conclusion

 According to the results of the present study, it is possible to use aerobic capacity estimation equations, which is a simple, accurate and safe tool in assessing the baseline cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak). It can be used as a daily clinical practice in large populations of adolescent boys and even heart patients and the elderly with the aim of promoting health, cardiovascular health, preventive actions and planning aerobic exercise program.
 

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted from the faculty validation of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Technology of Bu Ali Sina University. The authors would like to thank the staff of the Education Department of Hamadan, the Association of Parents and Teachers of the schools and the students who cooperated well in the implementation of this project.

 

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

 

Type of Study: Review | Subject: Other Cases
Received: 2019/12/24 | Accepted: 2020/08/17 | ePublished: 2020/08/17

References
1. Booth FW, Roberts CK, Laye MJ. Lack of exercise is a major cause of chronic diseases. Compr Physiol. 2012; 2(2):1143-1211. [DOI:10.1002/cphy.c110025] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Lavie CJ, Arena R, Swift DL, Johannsen, NM, Sui X, Lee DC, Earnest CP. Exercise and the cardiovascular system: clinical science and cardiovascular outcomes. Circ Res. 2015; 117(2):207-19. [DOI:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.305205] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Reis JF, Fatela P, Mendonca GV, Vaz JR, Valamatos MJ, Infante J, et al. Tissue Oxygenation in Response to Different Relative Levels of Blood-Flow Restricted Exercise. Front Physiol. 2019; 10:407. [DOI:10.3389/fphys.2019.00407] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Kodama S, Saito K, Tanaka S, Maki M, Yachi Y, Asumi M, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness as a quantitative predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in healthy men and women: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009; 301(19):2024-35. [DOI:10.1001/jama.2009.681] [PMID]
5. Prieto-Benavides DH, García-Hermoso A, Izquierdo M, Alonso-Martínez AM, Agostinis-Sobrinho C, Correa-Bautista JE, et al. Cardiorespiratory Fitness Cut-Points are Related to Body Adiposity Parameters in Latin American Adolescents. Medicina. 2019; 55(9):508. [DOI:10.3390/medicina55090508] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Rasch-Halvorsen Ø, Hassel E, Langhammer A, Brumpton BM, Steinshamn S. The association between dynamic lung volume and peak oxygen uptake in a healthy general population: the HUNT study. BMC Pulmon Med. 2019; 19(1):2. [DOI:10.1186/s12890-018-0762-x] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Poole DC, Jones AM. Measurement of the maximum oxygen uptake VO2max: VO2peak is no longer acceptable. J App Phys. 2017;122(4):997-1002. [DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.01063.2016] [PMID]
8. American College of Sports Medicine, editor. ACSM's health-related physical fitness assessment manual. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. [Article]
9. Cade WT, Bohnert KL, Reeds DN, Peterson LR, Bittel AJ, Bashir A, Byrne BJ, Taylor CL. Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) across childhood, adolescence and young adulthood in Barth syndrome: Data from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. PloS One. 2018;13(5):e0197776. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0197776] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Jurca R, Jackson AS, LaMonte MJ, Morrow JR, Blair SN, Wareham NJ, et al. Assessing cardiorespiratory fitness without performing exercise testing. America J Prev Med. 2005; 29(3):185-93. [DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2005.06.004] [PMID]
11. Shenoy S, Tyagi BS, Sandhu JS. Concurrent validity of the non-exercise-based VO2max prediction equation using percentage body fat as a variable in Asian Indian adults. Sports Med, Arthroscopy, Rehab, Ther Tech. 2012; 4(1):34. [DOI:10.1186/1758-2555-4-34] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Sartor F, Vernillo G, De Morree HM, Bonomi AG, La Torre A, Kubis HP, Veicsteinas A. Estimation of maximal oxygen uptake via submaximal exercise testing in sports, clinical, and home settings. Sports Med. 2013; 43(9):865-73. [DOI:10.1007/s40279-013-0068-3] [PMID]
13. St Clair Gibson A, Broomhead S, Lambert MI, Hawley JA. Prediction of maximal oxygen uptake from a 20-m shuttle run as measured directly in runners and squash players. Journal of Sports Sciences. 1998 Jan 1;16(4):331-5. [DOI:10.1080/02640419808559361] [PMID]
14. Bradshaw DI, George JD, Hyde A, LaMonte MJ, Vehrs PR, Hager RL, Yanowitz FG. An accurate VO2max nonexercise regression model for 18-65-year-old adults. Res Quart Exercise Sport. 2005; 76(4):426-32. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2005.10599315] [PMID]
15. Schembre SM, Riebe DA. Non-exercise estimation of VO2max using the international physical activity questionnaire. Meas Phys Edu Exer Sci. 2011; 15(3):168-81. [DOI:10.1080/1091367X.2011.568369] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. George JD, Paul SL, Hyde A, Bradshaw DI, Vehrs PR, Hager RL, Yanowitz FG. Prediction of maximum oxygen uptake using both exercise and non-exercise data. Meas Phys Edu Exer Sci. 2009; 13(1):1-2. [DOI:10.1080/10913670802609086]
17. Rexhepi AM, Brestovci B. Prediction of VO2max based on age, body mass, and resting heart rate. Human Mov. 2014; 15(1):56-9. [DOI:10.2478/humo-2014-0003]
18. Klusiewicz A, Borkowski L, Sitkowski D, Burkhard-Jagodzińska K, Szczepańska B, Ładyga M. Indirect methods of assessing maximal oxygen uptake in Rowers: Practical implications for evaluating physical fitness in a training cycle. J Human Kinetics. 2016; 50(1):187-94. [DOI:10.1515/hukin-2015-0155] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. Davis JA. Direct determination of aerobic power. Phys Assess Human Fit. 1995:9-17. [Google Scholar]
20. Ramsbottom R, Brewer J, Williams C. A progressive shuttle run test to estimate maximal oxygen uptake. British J Sports Med. 1988; 22(4):141-4. [DOI:10.1136/bjsm.22.4.141] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Kind S, Brighenti-Zogg S, Mundwiler J, Schüpbach U, Leuppi JD, Miedinger D, Dieterle T. Factors Associated with Cardiorespiratory Fitness in a Swiss Working Population. J Sports Med. 2019; Article ID: 5317961. [DOI:10.1155/2019/5317961] [PMID] [PMCID]
22. Neto M, de Albuquerque G, Farinatti PD. Non-exercise models for prediction of aerobic fitness and applicability on epidemiological studies: descriptive review and analysis of the studies. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte. 2003; 9(5):304-14. [DOI:10.1590/S1517-86922003000500006]
23. Loe H, Nes BM, Wisløff U. Predicting VO2peak from submaximal-and peak exercise models: the HUNT 3 fitness study, Norway. PloS One. 2016; 11(1):e0144873. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0144873] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Zhang T, Zhang CF, Jin F, Wang L. Association between genetic factor and physical performance. Hereditas. 2004; 26(2):219-26. [PMID] [Google Scholar]
25. Hirai T, Kusaka Y, Suganuma N, Seo A, Tobita Y. Work form affects maximum oxygen uptake for one year in workers. Indust Health. 2011; 49(3):321-7. [DOI:10.2486/indhealth.MS870] [PMID]
26. Chatterjee S, Chatterjee P. Prediction of maximal oxygen consumption from body mass, height and body surface area. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2006; 50(2):181-6. [Article] [Google Scholar]
27. Rao AV, Phadke AV, Patil PB, Joshi AR. Comparison of non-exercise test and step test in estimation of aerobic capacity (VO2max) in young adults. National J Phys Pharm Pharmac. 2014; 4(3):218. [DOI:10.5455/njppp.2014.4.150420141]
28. Bonen A, Heyward VH, Cureton KJ, Boileau RA, Massey BH. Prediction of maximal oxygen uptake in boys, ages 7-15 years. Med Sci Sport. 1979; 11(1):24-9. [PMID] [Google Scholar]
29. Verma SS, Gupta RK, Kishore N, Sen GJ. A simple relationship between maximal aerobic power and body weight in Indian adolescent boys. India J Med Sci. 1986; 40(4):93. [Google Scholar]
30. Erdmann LD, Hensley LD, Dolgener FA, Graham RE. Nonexercise Prediction of VO2peak in Middle School-Age Boys. Meas Phys Educ Exer Sci. 1999; 3(1):37-50. [DOI:10.1207/s15327841mpee0301_3]
31. Haycock GB, Schwartz GJ, Wisotsky DH. Geometric method for measuring body surface area: a height-weight formula validated in infants, children, and adults. J Ped. 1978; 93(1):62-6. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3476(78)80601-5]
32. Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG. Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin; 2003. [Google Scholar]
33. Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG. Introduction to linear regression analysis. Washington D.C.: John Wiley & Sons; 2012. [Google Scholar]
34. Kind S, Brighenti-Zogg S, Mundwiler J, Schüpbach U, Leuppi JD, Miedinger D, Dieterle T. Factors Associated with Cardiorespiratory Fitness in a Swiss Working Population. J Sport Med. 2019; Article ID: 5317961. [DOI:10.1155/2019/5317961] [PMID] [PMCID]
35. Dagan SS, Segev S, Novikov I, Dankner R. Waist circumference vs body mass index in association with cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy men and women: a cross sectional analysis of 403 subjects. Nut J. 2013; 12(1):12. [DOI:10.1186/1475-2891-12-12] [PMID] [PMCID]
36. Schantz P, Eriksson JS, Rosdahl H. The heart rate method for estimating oxygen uptake: analyses of reproducibility using a range of heart rates from commuter walking. Eur J App Phys. 2019; 119(11-12):2655-71. [DOI:10.1007/s00421-019-04236-0] [PMID] [PMCID]
37. Salehi S, Poursaeid Esfahani M, Hassabi M. Determine the estimated validity of Vo2max based on the formula in the female athlete and non-athlete. Res Med. 2020; 44(1): 326-30. [Article] [Google Scholar]
38. Wei Z, Chen L, Hou X, van Zijl PC, Xu J, Lu H. Age-related alterations in brain perfusion, venous oxygenation, and oxygen metabolic rate of mice: a 17-month longitudinal MRI study. Front Neurol. 2020; 11. [DOI:10.3389/fneur.2020.00559] [PMID] [PMCID]
39. Fleg JL, Morrell CH, Bos AG, Brant LJ, Talbot LA, Wright JG, Lakatta EG. Accelerated longitudinal decline of aerobic capacity in healthy older adults. Circul. 2005; 112(5):674-82. [DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.545459] [PMID]
40. Castillo-Garzón MJ, Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, Gutiérrez Á. Anti-aging therapy through fitness enhancement. Clin Intervent Age. 2006; 1(3):213. [DOI:10.2147/ciia.2006.1.3.213] [PMID] [PMCID]
41. Dwyer GB, Davis MD. ACSM's health related physical fitness manual. New Jersey: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. [Google Scholar]
42. Solway S, Brooks D, Lacasse Y, Thomas S. A qualitative systematic overview of the measurement properties of functional walk tests used in the cardiorespiratory domain. Chest. 2001; 119(1):256-70. [DOI:10.1378/chest.119.1.256] [PMID]
43. Mackenzie B. Performance evaluation tests. London: Electric World Plc. 2005; 24(25):57-158. [Article] [Google Scholar]
44. Boreham C, Twisk J, Neville C, Savage M, Murray L, Gallagher A. Associations between physical fitness and activity patterns during adolescence and cardiovascular risk factors in young adulthood: the Northern Ireland Young Hearts Project. Int J Sports Med. 2002; 23(S1):22-6. [DOI:10.1055/s-2002-28457] [PMID]
45. Anderssen SA, Cooper AR, Riddoch C, Sardinha LB, Harro M, Brage S, Andersen LB. Low cardiorespiratory fitness is a strong predictor for clustering of cardiovascular disease risk factors in children independent of country, age and sex. Europ J Cardiovasc Prev Rehab. 2007; 14(4):526-31. [DOI:10.1097/HJR.0b013e328011efc1] [PMID]
46. Wasserman K. Diagnosing cardiovascular and lung pathophysiology from exercise gas exchange. Chest. 1997; 112(4):1091-101. [DOI:10.1378/chest.112.4.1091] [PMID]
47. Sloan RA, Haaland BA, Leung C, Padmanabhan U, Koh HC, Zee A. Cross-validation of a non-exercise measure for cardiorespiratory fitness in Singaporean adults. Singapore Med J. 2013; 54(10):576-80. [DOI:10.11622/smedj.2013186] [PMID]
48. Sharma M, Kamal R, Chawla K. Correlation of body composition to aerobic capacity; A cross sectional study. Int J App Res. 2016; 2(1):38-42. [Google Scholar]
49. Wier LT, Jackson AS, Ayers GW, Arenare B. Nonexercise models for estimating VO2max with waist girth, percent fat, or BMI. Med Sci Sports Exer. 2006; 38(3):555-61. [DOI:10.1249/01.mss.0000193561.64152] [PMID]
50. Hale T. Exercise physiology: a thematic approach. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2005. [Article]
51. Menezes Júnior FJ, Jesus ÍC, Leite N. Predictive equations of maximum oxygen consumption by shuttle run test in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Revista Paulista de Pediatria. 2019: 37(2). [DOI:10.1590/1984-0462/;2019;37;2;00016] [PMID] [PMCID]
52. Armstrong N, Barker AR. Oxygen uptake kinetics in children and adolescents: a review. Pediat Exer Sci. 2009; 21(2):130-47. [DOI:10.1123/pes.21.2.130] [PMID]
53. Nazem F, Saki S, Jalili M. Validation of Francis Step Protocol by Respiratory Gases Analyses and Design Native Equation to Estimate Aerobic Capacity in Iranian Boys. Knowledge Health. 2017; 12(1):66-72. [Google Scholar]
54. Uth N, Sørensen H, Overgaard K, Pedersen PK. Estimation of V̇O2max from the ratio between HR max and HR rest-the Heart Rate Ratio Method. Euro J App Phys. 2005; 91(1):111-5. [DOI:10.1007/s00421-003-0988-y] [PMID]
55. Narang N, Thibodeau JT, Levine BD, Gore MO, Ayers CR, Lange RA, et al. Inaccuracy of estimated resting oxygen uptake in the clinical setting. Circul. 2014; 129(2):203-10. [DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003334] [PMID]
56. Tonelli AR, Wang XF, Abbay A, Zhang Q, Ramos J, McCarthy K. Can we better estimate resting oxygen consumption by incorporating arterial blood gases and spirometric determinations? Respir Care. 2015; 60(4):517-25. [DOI:10.4187/respcare.03555] [PMID] [PMCID]
57. Shephard RJ, Weese CH, Merriman JE. Prediction of maximal oxygen intake from anthropometric data. Int J App Phys Inc Occ Phys. 1971; 29(2):119-30. [DOI:10.1007/BF00698022] [PMID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Ergonomics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb |