Showing 3 results for Niosh
Alireza Choobineh, Hadi Daneshmandi, Maryam Parand, Rezvan Ghobadi, Abdollah Haghayegh, Froogh Zare,
Volume 1, Issue 2 (12-2013)
Abstract
Introduction: Regarding to the competing and increasing competitions in organization and markets, paying attention to manpower and his quality of work life have progressively become important. This study was conducted with the objective of investigating of quality of working life and determination of its related factors in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS) staff.
Material and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 218 employees of SUMS participated voluntarily. A questionnaire consisted of two parts was used as data collecting tool. In the first part, demographic and occupational characteristics, and in the second part questions about the quality of working life were included. Data were analyzed using statistical tests including Pearson Correlation, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U by SPSS software (Version 16.0).
Results: Mean and standard deviation scores for the quality of working life of staff were 127.51±16.61. The results showed that there were associations between gender and income with quality of work life score (p<0.05), such that the quality of work life scores of women and high-income individuals were higher than those of men and lower- income staff. Age, job tenure, marital status, number of children, level of education, type of employment and job unit had no association with quality of work life score.
Discussion: In this study, quality of work life had association with gender and income level of staff.
Raziyeh Morshedi, Matreh Boazar, Davood Afshari, Kambiz Ahmadi Angali, Maryam Malek Zadeh,
Volume 3, Issue 1 (6-2015)
Abstract
Introduction: Manual handling of loads and carrying tasks widely exists in many occupations. Hospital staff because of Manual carrying of loads, are at increased risk of musculoskeletal disorders. Incorrect lifting methods, is an important risk factor for low back pain. The aim of this study was to analyze the biomechanical loads on the lumbar of nurses-aid in manual handling activities of serum cartons 12.5 kg in hospital and provide ergonomic solutions is the prevention of back pain.
Methods: This study was conducted one of the hospitals in Ahvaz city in year 1392. evaluated Postures were sampled through observation and photography. Then load lifting of complex index, was calculated by NIOSH equation and estimate the compressive forces on vertebras L5/ S1 as a quantitative index using software 3 D SSPP, during 2 stages before and after the intervention. The results of tests using Correlation, Regression and T-test were analyzed
Results: The results showed that the highest RWL in the top row 89/9 kg and minimum on the bottom row was 44/5 kg. The highest and lowest compressive force was estimated in the bottom and top rows, respectively, 6727 and 3707 Newton. Results of statistical tests showed significant reduction between the load lifting of complex index(CLI), and the compressive force average before and after the reform is the work station.
Conclusion:Throgh biomechanical analysis of work stations with two methods quantitatively and qualitatively can be made more accurate assessment and ergonomic conditions at work stations can be modified more accurately.
Dr Ehsanollah Habibi, Emad Mirsalimi, Faezeh Darabi, Kamran Ebrahimi,
Volume 6, Issue 4 (3-2019)
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This study focused on lifting drill rods. Drilling is a repetitive and heavy mining operation with a high incidence and severity of musculoskeletal injuries. The purpose of this study was to examine how to lift a vertical drill bit (1.61m and 35kg in height) using two types of rod height and four feet positions, and finally compare them with the Lifting Index (LI).
Methods: Seven workers participated in this study. Each person raised a rod and held it vertically. Reflective markers were installed on each person, and from three cameras and an Ergo-meter plate for record forces and Movement of the limbs. In this case, four positions of the foot and pressures on the lower back were Investigated (position0=to the rod, position45=diagonally to the rod, position90=right side of the bar and free posture). In addition, two positions of the height of the rod were Investigated, at the first, the end of rod was on the ground (height of the rod was 83 m), and in the following the end of rod was on the Basket with height 20cm (rod height of 1.03 m).
Results: The Lifting Index (LI) for each person was equal to 1.4 in the NIOSH lifting equation. It was found that the vertical height of the rod had the greatest effect at the load on the lower back. Some workers use techniques that endure less pressure on their waist.
Conclusion: Finally, it was found that the asymmetric loading Condition (90 ° angle) was the worst case compared to the Lifting index and NIOSH standard.
