Write your message

Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Muscle Synergy

Saeed Ilbeigi, Masoumeh Al-Eghabi, Mohammad Yousefi, Mohammad Hamed Hosseini,
Volume 12, Issue 3 (12-2024)
Abstract

Objectives: Designing one-handed carrying tasks based on biomechanical findings has a significant impact on preventing musculoskeletal injuries. The present study was conducted to investigate the muscle synergy of the trunk and pelvis in the manual carrying of loads with different weights in healthy young people.
Methods: In this experimental study, 20 male volunteers performed the walking protocol without load, carrying different weights of 5%, 10%, and 15% of their own weight during unilateral manual load carrying. The electrical activity of the trunk and pelvis muscles while carrying loads of different weights was recorded using an electromyography device (Biovision). To evaluate the differences between different load-carrying conditions, a repeated measures test was used at a significance level of P≤0.05.
Results: The results showed that in the performance of manual load carrying, there was a significant difference between muscle synergy (synergy size) in all walking protocols, including 5% and 10% of body weight and 5% and 15% of body weight and between 15% and 10% (P≤05). While in the performance of manual load carrying, a significant difference was found between muscle synergy (synergy direction) in 5% of body weight and 10% of body weight, this difference was not seen in manual load carrying with 5% of body weight and 15% of body weight and also between synergy of 15% and 10% (P≥0.05).
Conclusion: It seems that the difference in muscle synergy in terms of size in unilateral manual load carrying can, with increasing load, create more tension in the back and pelvic muscles; however, the direction or angle does not change compared to the no-load state.

Fatemeh Rezaie Pourmashizi, Behrouz Hajilou, Rashid Heidarimoghadam, Sara Anbarian, Mehrdad Anbarian,
Volume 13, Issue 1 (5-2025)
Abstract

Background and Objectives: Core muscles of individuals with low back pain show a different pattern of activity compared to the healthy group during load lifting. This issue may be due to changes in spinal control mechanisms such as muscle synergies. The aim of this study was to compare the synergy pattern of selected core muscles and lower limbs muscles during load lifting and lowering with two different techniqus among females with non-specific back pain in comparison with healthy group.

Methods: Eighteen healthy females with non-specific back apin and 18 match controls participated in this study. The activity of 8 muscles of the core and lower limbs was recorded while lifting a load of 10% of the subject's mass with stoop and squat techniques. Then, using non-negative matrix factorization algorithm, the pattern of muscle synergies was extracted. Pearson's correlation method and independed t-test was used to compare synergy patterns (p<0.05).

Results: Patients with back pain had a different muscle synergy pattern compared to the healthy group in both stoop and squat techniques. The peak muscle synergy patterns of patients in both techniques were different from healthy subjects and were created in a different time cycle of lifting the load.

Conclusion: The results of this study showed that individuals with non-specific back pain use different synergy patterns during load lifting, and the body's control system may respons differently in patients with non-specific low back pain compared to healthy individuals. It is possible that the changes observed in the relative weight of muscles in patients and healthy people are caused by the changes in muscle synergy patterns, which requires further studies.



Page 1 from 1     

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Ergonomics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb |